Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 18:18:19 -0500
Subject: SXN50 and GEO mode
From: johnf@geology.wisc.edu
Errors-to: johnf@geology.wisc.edu
Reply-to: sx50-users@relay.doit.wisc.edu
Message-id: <9609232244.AA20620@ice.geology.wisc.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Precedence: bulk
Originator: sx50-users@relay.doit.wisc.edu
X-Listprocessor-version: 6.0b -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: O

From

"CLAUDIO CERMIGNANI"@QUARTZ.GEOLOGY.UTORONTO.CA


To Pierre Staub:

You have seen the comments received so far about the Geo option; is the
situation worse than you expected? If so, do you still think you want to
fix it? I still believe it is better to have no Geo at all, than
to have one you cannot trust, but my preference is ultimately for a Geo
that does work. Can we help? how?

Re QUALI step scanning: I have never used it, so probably I would not
miss it either.

Claudio