Date: Thu, 29 Jun 95 14:57:56 EDT
Subject: Re: For the Cameca SX50 community; input please!
From: jstirlin@emr.ca (John A. R. Stirling)

X-Mailer:

Status: OR



At 04:12 PM 28/6/95 CDT, johnf@geology.wisc.edu wrote:

>To: Cameca SX50 community

From: John Fournelle

>Re: Two items of some importance

>

>Item #1

> As someone who has, to some varying extent, been 'on top' of the*****





I strongly believe that the group should open to all interested parties.

Especially experienced former Cameca service people who have a wealth of

knowledge to give to the group. I have had some of those service people in

the lab at the GSC by request, because I highly value their expericence. If

Cameca would be more open about the problems with their equipment; both the

MBX and sx50's, this discussion group may not be necessary. I have been

totally amazed of the lack of documentation provided by Cameca and by their

slow response to fundalmental problems: for example the lack of linearity in

the count rate of the SX50.



Regards John Stirling